The analogy is clear: instead of notes, the atomic unit is a song, portion of a song, or soundbyte instead of a traditional instrument, the DJ uses pre-recorded sounds on albums or loaded into a sampler or mixer or midi capable of altering it further. Like a soloist, certain premeditated musical phrases are combined to create a “sentence” or a statement. The artistic process behind crafting a set for a particular event, or in conceiving a mixtape, follows the same logic behind creating these sound collages. These changes go far in explaining not only the transition of many deejays into producers and remixers, but also the forced changes in copyright law that has followed. This technique has been facilitated by the explosion in home-studio software and their increased compatibility with a range of hardware options beyond the vinyl or CD turntable. In this case, samples are cut, spliced, distorted, and repeated as instruments or notes, as in a favored bass kick or symbol clash entered into a sample bank and replayed in a whole new rhythmic or melodic milieu. The smaller these sonic ingredients become, the more are needed to fill a “canvas” and the closer a set moves to becoming a truly original piece of music. Hiding their variegated threads is not always compatible with the goal of improvisation, as it requires knowing a song intimately enough to hide certain sections (down to fractions of seconds), often employing only snippets as transitions to create a sort of sound collage. One consolation is that for a DJ with far-flung musical interests, discrete tracks are not commonly recognizable, making it easier to achieve the goal of weaving sets that appear to be one continuous piece of music. These pairings or progressions can have a high degree of mixing difficulty, appearing at first blush too disparate to flow properly one after the other. Fulfilling this expectation can be exciting to the crowd but fatiguing to the frequent performer-hence certain artists’ emphasis on Jazz music’s improvisational ethos of never playing the same tune the same way twice.Ī more salient stylistic consideration for an eclectic DJ is not so much in cleaving to certain clusters of favorite tracks, as presenting radically different tracks in the same or similar way. (Think of the way certain jam bands regularly splice together two or more tunes, until they cannot get away with performing one unless the other follow, such as the Grateful Dead’s China Cat Sunflower into I Know You, Rider-a cover that they have made their own). Thus, even when one forges a real-time set that reacts to live energy and requests, the way in which s/he reacts maintains something of a personal style insofar as it repeats certain of those tried-and-true track progressions with which people may become familiar as trademarks. It is in this way that one’s best improvisational moments solidify into a style. If it works, it can become one of these favored progressions DJ’s refine and reuse. If it does not sound in the headphones as projected in the “mind’s ear”, that familiar option is still a click, eject/load, or record flip away…if one still has time. Every track represents a turn the improvisational DJ must make a decision at each fork to either tend toward well-trodden paths, familiar from his/her own mixing or others’, or to try something new. In that self-reflexive process, potential rhythmic pathways present themselves, parts of which are familiar. When playing a party or club, savvy disc-jocks use the crowd as a barometer, tailoring the energy/BPM of the music to the crowd’s “combustability” until the point where they can direct that energy. My sets are almost always improvisational. The PhDJ’s Artist’s Statement for The Rubin-Frankel Gallery’s 6th Annual Juried Art Exhibition, "A Private Glimpse"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |